WASHINGTON D.C. A recent video from the Benny Johnson channel, titled “YIKES: Feds Admit To Epstein COVER-UP!? ‘Mountains’ of Evidence to be Released After Massive Lawsuit,” has ignited fresh outrage and intensified calls for transparency regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. The discussion centers on the perceived mishandling of evidence and escalating demands for full disclosure from the administration, with prominent voices like Glenn Beck and Megyn Kelly questioning the integrity of the process.
The host, Benny Johnson, expressed profound disappointment regarding past assurances of disclosure. He recalled an earlier interview with Pam Bondi, where she conveyed that “President Trump has given a very strong directive and that’s going to be followed” regarding Epstein documents. Johnson noted the stark contrast with a subsequent shift in narrative, questioning, “How do you go from that to there are no documents, there is no list, there was no blackmail, everyone’s innocent, we’re all good, move along. How does that happen?” This perceived reversal fuels public skepticism about the commitment to full disclosure.
The video highlights a significant development with Judicial Watch’s lawsuit against the Justice Department and FBI. A joint status report in federal court indicates that the Justice Department and FBI are now reviewing records for possible release in a FOIA lawsuit related to Epstein’s clients and associates. This disclosure, as presented in the video, appears to contradict a previously leaked memo suggesting no further Epstein records would be made public. Johnson emphasized the public’s right to this information, asserting, “We, the American people, decide what’s warranted. We decide what we want. This is a country for us, by us.”
The article details what is presented as “damning evidence that blows a hole in the FBI’s claim that Jeffrey Epstein didn’t blackmail powerful friends.” This includes photos of dozens of CDs, binders, and hard drives reportedly found at Epstein’s New York mansion during a 2018 raid. A particularly striking claim is that Epstein was leasing this Manhattan townhouse from the State Department, which had reportedly seized it from the Iranian government. Further allegations, citing a 2021 Evening Standard profile, suggest Epstein “claimed regularly that he worked for the CIA” and even “smuggles guns into the UK for fun,” raising serious questions about the nature of his connections and activities. The video asserts that “The black book does actually exist. The files actually do exist. The government has all of them and we know exactly where they are.”
Critics contend that the Justice Department’s recent statement that “no further disclosure of material would be appropriate or warranted” is deeply insulting to the public. Johnson vehemently pushed back against any insinuation that public demand for transparency equates to a desire for illicit material, stating, “Nobody stop insulting us and saying that we want CP released on the internet. Stop insulting us saying that we like we’re some type of like mongaloid trogloites that want predator material on the internet. No, we don’t. You can keep it. Shove it where the sun don’t shine. I don’t want it. You don’t want it.” He clarified the public’s demand: “What I want is a more full constellation of what the Jeffrey Epstein op was.” Johnson concluded this segment with a clear message: “The exposure of these people and the punishment of them is what a just society would do.”
The discussion also touched on perceived political silence from some quarters. Johnson observed, “You don’t see anybody on the left angry about it at all. They’re silent as the grave on all this. Isn’t that curious?” This perceived lack of bipartisan outrage further fuels suspicions among those demanding answers.
Towards the end of the video, Steve Bannon is highlighted, calling for a special prosecutor to investigate the Epstein files. Bannon, described as “the beating heart of MAGA,” argues that it would be easy to unseal court documents and uncover who else was involved. He underscored the high stakes for the movement, stating, “If we don’t run the tables, they’re going to destroy us. And you know what? We will deserve to be destroyed.” This sentiment reflects a belief that failure to achieve full transparency and accountability in the Epstein case would represent a significant moral and strategic defeat. Such an outcome, if it were to transpire, could rightly be leveraged by political opponents to highlight perceived moral ambiguities and failures within the movement, undermining its claims of fighting corruption and upholding justice.
This call for a special prosecutor, alongside the ongoing Judicial Watch lawsuit, signals a powerful and determined push from various factions for full accountability and the complete release of all Epstein-related information. The sentiment among many, echoing figures like Glenn Beck and Megyn Kelly, is clear: the administration must either provide full transparency regarding the Epstein files or face mounting calls for accountability, including potential resignations.
Source:
- Johnson, Benny. (2025, July 10). YIKES: Feds Admit To Epstein COVER-UP!? ‘Mountains’ of Evidence to be Released After Massive Lawsuit. [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU740kLDKw8
Leave a Reply